Wednesday, July 17, 2019

Julius Caesar Seminar Questions

Julius Caesar Seminar Questions 1. When Caesar introduces that Cassius thinks too much, I agree. Cassius tends to look into the details and over think simple situations. He hold outs precise meticulous intimately(predicate) how the assemblage of the conspirators is organized. Also, while Cassius is the one and only(a) who origin on the wholey comes up with the idea of the conspiracy and that he emergencys Brutus to be in charge, he thinks by dint of the plan, tho does non want to take province. Cassius on the button about argues with himself, c every last(predicate) suitable to too some(prenominal) thoughts running done his mind. He thinks about so vile a amour as Caesar But, O grief, where hast thou lead me?I perhaps speak this in front a willing bondman. Then I know my answer must be made. But I am arm and dangers to me in different, (1. 3. 11-115), proving that his thoughts be all over the place. 2. Brutus does not want the conspirators to swear an lad of committal because he feels that it is bad to think that or our cause or our performance did call for an oath when all drop of pedigree that every papist bears, and nobly bears is guilty, (2. 1. 136-139). Brutus obviously feels that if their intentions and motivations to carrying out the assassination of Caesar, they do not need an oath.An oath causes people to tucker out lazy because they begin to lean on the idea that, no matter what happens. 3. Caesars repartee to Calphurnias fears adds credence to Brutus and Cassius fears about Caesar because he does not heed warnings. This response capacity add to the pattern Caesar might follow when new(prenominal) senators bring up new ideas. This crumb be very serious for others that want to set out middling of a say when it comes to their opinion on a serious matter. Calpurnia notes that his wisdom is consumed in confidence, (2. 2. 49), demonstrate that Caesar has the idea that what he thinks is what is to happen, without whats oever other opinion. 4.The significance of Caesars conglutination star speech at the Capitol is that Caesar establishes his ideals most his role in power. Caesar frames his arrogance and bullet-headed nature by stating there is no fellow in the firmament, (3. 1. 62). In his eyes, he walks on water to all of those that are his supporters and followers. Caesar is overly confident, providing reason to the motivations of the conspirators in their pursuit to assassinate Caesar. 5. The third plebeians cry of Let him be Caesar, (3. 2. 52) is humorous because, while the people do not know of the truth being the conspiracy, the polish was to take out Caesar, not set back him. epoch their quest have the appearance _or_ semblances victoryful, the true hardships have hitherto to begin. 6. In the play, Shakespeare portrays the common man as almost incoherent. The people constantly seem to be easily swayed by the speech of each and every important character. Also, all of the common peo ple are followers. non one stands up to the officials. At one moment, they are manifestation, This Caesar was a tyrant, (3. 2. 74) and the next they say that they must tear him to pieces Hes a conspirator, (3. 3. 29), now tempestuous with the revenge against Caesar. 7. Shakespeare portrays the noblemen in the play as daring but also cowards.While they follow through with what they originally decide to believe in, in the end, they are left questioning their motives. While I commend them for following through with their original endeavors, they begin to get quite brutal. An example is when Antony pass waters a hit enumerate and says that, these many, then, shall die their names are pricked, (4. 1. 1-2). The noblemen want to be noble and true, yet they go to such brutal extremes. 8. The idea that Brutus never gives in to Cassius shows a little grab of stubbornness, but it also shows determination. Brutus feels that he knows what is surmount for the conspirators.The differenc e between the ways Brutus is bouncing and that of Cassius is how firm Brutus is. He makes his point, but shows its advantages to different members. He shows compassion when he says that when every drop of blood every Roman bears, and nobly bears, is guilty of a some(prenominal) bastardy if he do break dance the smallest particle of any agreement that hath passed from him, (2. 1. 134-140). Brutus is saying that an oath would be pointless because if a man were held responsible for every promise he ever broke, the consequences would be endless. 9. Calpurnia and Portia twain seem like protective and honorable wives.Calpurnia is more than think on her save taking his warnings seriously. She is not focused on the details of everything that happens, but is focused on the main idea that Caesars, her conserve, life is in danger. Portia, on the other hand, is more focused on what Brutus is doing. She wants to be informed of the natural process rather than simply protecting her husba nd from what is happening, whether she as an explanation or not. She is angered that, at the moment, apparently, within the bond of sumit is expected I should know no secrets that appertain to you Brutus, (2. 1. 280-282). She feels wronged by this.Portia is driven by facts and information, while Calpurnia is driven by cognition and her feelings. 10. Cassius tells Brutus that if he himself fears the reign of Caesar, that he, Brutus, must fall by the wayside it. Cassius provides Brutus with logical and emotional factors for reasons as to why Brutus should lead the conspiracy. Cassius informs Brutus that, There was a Brutus in one case that would have brooked th eternal get at to keep his state in capital of Italy as easily as a king, (1. 2. 159-160). Cassius makes the point that Brutus would never let capital of Italy fall by the hands of Caesar. Cassius is essentially telling Brutus what to think and what to feel.While this is cleverly artful of Cassius, it shows that Brutus ha s some mental weakness due to the fact that he is even able to be subject to mind games. 11. Brutus and Cassius are twain leaders. While Brutus takes charge and responsibility of the conspiracy, Cassius is the one who took responsibility of persuading Brutus to join in and become the leader. While this shows a artful side of Cassius, Brutus has the same. He manages to convince all of the conspirators that an official oath is not necessary, when, in reality, it is often used as a sacred promise to follow through with a plan.In my mind, a sacred oath would have been somewhat important to the success of the plan, but, as Brutus points out, what other oath than truth to satin flower engaged that this shall be, (2. 1. 126-128). In Brutus mind, honesty and honor is all that is needed in a group decision to belong with the assassination of Caesar. Cassius strongly disagrees, but, while both men have conflicting ideas, their fondness values are quite similar, showing in their agreemen t to create the conspiracy. 12. Cassius wants to create the conspiracy for more personal reasoning.Cassius, utter about Caesar, notes that this man is now become a god, and Cassius is a wretched marionette and must bend his body, (1. 2. 115-117). From this, one can tell that Cassius is more focused on his personal aspirations to be free of Caesars grip on politics. Brutus, on the other hand, is more focused on the salubrious being of the people of Rome. He wants them to have a fair, focused, and just ruler. While Brutus and Cassius motives for enable the conspiracy could not be more different, the men find common build on which they agree to attempt a successful assassination of Caesar.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.